Roo Code vs Cline vs Kilo Code
A focused side-by-side comparison using the existing Roo Code and Cline comparison data: maintenance status, agent model, IDE coverage, migration path, model access, and teams.
At a glance
Kilo is the maintained upgrade path for Roo users and the broader multi-surface option compared with Cline's simpler VS Code-first flow.
Which one should you choose?
The decision mostly comes down to maintenance, platform coverage, and how much agent orchestration you need.
Kilo Code
Developers who want Roo/Cline-style open-source autonomy, active maintenance, multiple modes, and the same workflow across VS Code, JetBrains, and CLI.
Roo Code
Existing Roo users who need a short transition window and already have .roo rules, .roomodes, and provider settings in place.
Cline
VS Code users who want an open-source BYOK agent and prefer a single plan/act flow over multiple specialized modes.
Detailed comparison
A feature-by-feature look at lifecycle, agent workflows, platform coverage, model access, and team capabilities.
Lifecycle & Maintenance
Agents & Workflow
Platform Coverage
Models, Pricing & Teams
Verdict
Kilo Code is the safest default if you are choosing today: it keeps the open-source Roo/Cline lineage, adds active maintenance, preserves a Roo migration path, and expands the workflow to JetBrains, CLI, Cloud Agents, subagents, and Agent Manager. Cline remains a strong simple option for VS Code users. Roo Code is best treated as a migration source because the repo archives on May 15, 2026.