Windsurf vs Cursor vs Kilo Code
Windsurf and Cursor both sell an AI-native editor. Kilo Code is the open-source alternative for teams that want model choice, local models, and multi-surface agent workflows.
Quick verdict
Windsurf
AI editorDevelopers who want a dedicated AI editor with Cascade, Supercomplete, and a credit-based plan model.
- •Cascade agent experience
- •Supercomplete autocomplete
- •Credit-based pricing model
Cursor
AI-native IDEDevelopers who want a mature AI-first editor with strong Tab autocomplete, background agents, and enterprise controls.
- •Cursor Tab and next edits
- •Background agents
- •Business controls at team tier
Kilo Code
Open-source agentTeams that prefer open-source code, transparent usage, flexible models, and agents across IDE, CLI, cloud, and Slack.
- •Open source and free for individuals
- •500+ hosted models plus local model support
- •Team billing, analytics, SSO/SCIM, and audit logs
Feature-by-feature comparison
Windsurf and Cursor are closest when you want a replacement editor. Kilo is strongest when you want the agent to follow your workflow rather than move your workflow into one editor.
Where Kilo fits
Kilo is the better fit when your team likes parts of the AI editor experience but does not want the editor itself to become the platform boundary. You can keep familiar IDEs, use the CLI, run cloud agents, and choose the model/provider per job.